grassrootseconomics/kitabu-chain
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Consensus engines comparison #1

New Issue
Closed
opened 2022-01-10 16:16:32 +01:00 by kamikazechaser · 6 comments
kamikazechaser commented 2022-01-10 16:16:32 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

OpenEthereum supports:

  • AuRa (Authority Round) - Originally implemented in Parity/OpenEthereum
  • Clique - Originally implemented in Geth

Refs:

Possible alternatives:

OpenEthereum supports: - AuRa (Authority Round) - Originally implemented in Parity/OpenEthereum - Clique - Originally implemented in Geth Refs: - http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2058/paper-06.pdf - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.10244.pdf - https://github.com/drandreaskrueger/chainhammer - https://github.com/Azure-Samples/blockchain - https://github.com/openethereum/parity-ethereum/issues/9393 - https://github.com/openethereum/parity-ethereum/issues/10382 Possible alternatives: - [Clique (Geth)](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-225) - [Quorum (Consensys Geth Fork)](https://github.com/ConsenSys/quorum) - [Quorum IBFT](https://consensys.net/docs/goquorum/en/latest/configure-and-manage/configure/consensus-protocols/ibft/) - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.03421.pdf
lash commented 2022-01-11 11:28:53 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Forks

source: https://ethereum.org/en/history/

compared with: https://github.com/bloxberg-org/bloxbergValidatorSetup/blob/master/validator/bloxberg.json

Only in mainchain

Constantinople

Istanbul

Only in Bloxberg

Additional EIPs to consider for kitabu

Berlin

Openethereum compatibility

Config examples:

Several EIPs do not seem to be included among the keys that are parsed through config. We should probably ask why that is the case.

# Forks source: https://ethereum.org/en/history/ compared with: https://github.com/bloxberg-org/bloxbergValidatorSetup/blob/master/validator/bloxberg.json ## Only in mainchain ### Constantinople * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1234 make sure blockchain doesn't freeze before proof-of-stake) ### Istanbul * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-152 zcash interoperability * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1108 cheaper crypto ## Only in Bloxberg * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1283 concerns sstore spend and refund calculations, dep for 1706? * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1706 addresses origin [constantinople re-entrancy problem](https://blog.ethereum.org/2019/01/15/security-alert-ethereum-constantinople-postponement/) (implementation says "TODO" in EIP :D ) ## Additional EIPs to consider for kitabu ### Berlin * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2565 lower modexp gas cost * https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2718 transaction typing ## Openethereum compatibility Config examples: * https://github.com/openethereum/openethereum/tree/f13fa10b8a0803116642f349c5557923afb2b5ba/crates/ethcore/res/chainspec/test/basic_authority.json minimal authority example * https://github.com/openethereum/openethereum/tree/f13fa10b8a0803116642f349c5557923afb2b5ba/crates/ethcore/res/chainspec/test/berlin_test.json full berlin hardfork * https://github.com/openethereum/openethereum/tree/f13fa10b8a0803116642f349c5557923afb2b5ba/crates/ethcore/res/chainspec/goerli.json clique config example Several EIPs do not seem to be included among the keys that are parsed through config. We should probably ask why that is the case. * https://github.com/openethereum/openethereum/blob/f13fa10b8a0803116642f349c5557923afb2b5ba/crates/ethcore/src/spec/spec.rs#L69
lash commented 2022-01-11 11:36:23 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

(annoying that gitea snips remote host urls)

(annoying that gitea snips remote host urls)
willruddick commented 2022-01-12 10:23:39 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

thoughts on https://evmos.org/ ?

thoughts on https://evmos.org/ ?
lash commented 2022-01-12 12:19:03 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@willruddick for the short term we know too little about evmos.

We don't know how stable is it, nor whether anything important is based on currently running instances.

We don't know about the performance of it; it most likely wraps a significant portion of geth, and geth is very heavy.

We can't use this with other ethereum clients, that locks us in to the cosmos ecosystem.

@willruddick for the short term we know too little about evmos. We don't know how stable is it, nor whether anything important is based on currently running instances. We don't know about the performance of it; it most likely wraps a significant portion of geth, and geth is very heavy. We can't use this with other ethereum clients, that locks us in to the cosmos ecosystem.
lash commented 2022-01-12 12:19:44 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

collection of links and resources https://holbrook.no/share/incoming/kitabu_research/

collection of links and resources https://holbrook.no/share/incoming/kitabu_research/
kamikazechaser commented 2022-02-14 17:00:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Opted for AuRA

Opted for AuRA
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: grassrootseconomics/kitabu-chain#1
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?