Fixes incorrect comment. (#10913)
I _believe_ (someone please double-check my work) that this comment is subtly incorrect and in fact the replacement will occur if the new gas price is exactly 12.5% (given current configuration) higher. Relevant pieces of code: ```rust fn bump_gas_price(old_gp: U256) -> U256 { old_gp.saturating_add(old_gp >> GAS_PRICE_BUMP_SHIFT) } ``` ```rust let min_required_gp = bump_gas_price(*old_gp); match min_required_gp.cmp(&new_gp) { cmp::Ordering::Greater => scoring::Choice::RejectNew, _ => scoring::Choice::ReplaceOld, } ```
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc796a232a
commit
8099efe215
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ use txpool::{self, scoring};
|
||||
use super::{verifier, PrioritizationStrategy, VerifiedTransaction, ScoredTransaction};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Transaction with the same (sender, nonce) can be replaced only if
|
||||
/// `new_gas_price > old_gas_price + old_gas_price >> SHIFT`
|
||||
/// `new_gas_price >= old_gas_price + old_gas_price >> SHIFT`
|
||||
const GAS_PRICE_BUMP_SHIFT: usize = 3; // 2 = 25%, 3 = 12.5%, 4 = 6.25%
|
||||
|
||||
/// Calculate minimal gas price requirement.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user