urdt/ussd
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 50 Pull Requests 6 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

consider compressed view of transaction list #130

New Issue
Open
opened 2024-10-23 16:41:02 +02:00 by lash · 3 comments
lash commented 2024-10-23 16:41:02 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
No description provided.
lash added the
Kind/Enhancement
ux
Activity:Proposal
 labels 2024-10-23 16:41:17 +02:00
lash commented 2024-10-24 19:59:29 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@willruddick @kamikazechaser your opinion on this?

currently the transaction view is one tx per page. Probably could fit several on one page, with choice of viewing individual ones by selecting them.

@willruddick @kamikazechaser your opinion on this? currently the transaction view is one tx per page. Probably could fit several on one page, with choice of viewing individual ones by selecting them.
Alfred-mk commented 2024-10-28 16:12:34 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Current sample of the transaction history. The question is whether we should have a list of transactions where one can provide the number, to view the full transaction data

Current sample of the transaction history. The question is whether we should have a list of transactions where one can provide the number, to view the full transaction data
signal-2024-10-23-172951_002.jpeg
50 KiB
signal-2024-10-23-172951_002.jpeg
kamikazechaser commented 2024-11-06 07:36:15 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link
  1. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date]
  2. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date]
  3. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date]

and if you choose [1] you get a full info

1. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date] 2. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date] 3. [in/out] [symbol] [amount] [date] and if you choose [1] you get a full info
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels   
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug

Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation

Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement

Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature

New functionality

  
Kind/Security

This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing

Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
Activity:Doing

An item actively being worked on currently

  
Activity:Proposal

A proposal for a new feature or enhancement

  
Runner
AT

  
Runner
CLI

  
Runner
HTTP

  
cleanup

   
devops

   
easypeasy

A task that can be completed with little effort

  
exchange

relating to swapping of assets and offramps

  
l8ter

   
legacy

Legacy features from the old ussd system to be ported

  
optimization

   
privilege

features that have to do with special, privileged axx

  
refactor

   
smell

Code smell

  
support

transparency and help with exception states

  
tooling

   
ux
No Label
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
Activity:Doing
Activity:Proposal
Runner
AT
Runner
CLI
Runner
HTTP
cleanup
devops
easypeasy
exchange
l8ter
legacy
optimization
privilege
refactor
smell
support
tooling
ux
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: urdt/ussd#130
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?