profile-edit-traverse #199
@ -726,6 +726,18 @@ func (h *Handlers) ResetIncorrectPin(ctx context.Context, sym string, input []by
|
||||
return res, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Setback sets the flag_back_set flag when the navigation is back
|
||||
func (h *Handlers) SetBack(ctx context.Context, sym string, input []byte) (resource.Result, error) {
|
||||
var res resource.Result
|
||||
//TODO:
|
||||
//Add check if the navigation is lateral nav instead of checking the input.
|
||||
if string(input) == "0" {
|
||||
|
||||
flag_back_set, _ := h.flagManager.GetFlag("flag_back_set")
|
||||
res.FlagSet = append(res.FlagSet, flag_back_set)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return res, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// CheckAccountStatus queries the API using the TrackingId and sets flags
|
||||
// based on the account status
|
||||
func (h *Handlers) CheckAccountStatus(ctx context.Context, sym string, input []byte) (resource.Result, error) {
|
||||
@ -1332,6 +1344,9 @@ func (h *Handlers) GetCurrentProfileInfo(ctx context.Context, sym string, input
|
||||
flag_gender_set, _ := h.flagManager.GetFlag("flag_gender_set")
|
||||
flag_location_set, _ := h.flagManager.GetFlag("flag_location_set")
|
||||
flag_offerings_set, _ := h.flagManager.GetFlag("flag_offerings_set")
|
||||
flag_back_set, _ := h.flagManager.GetFlag("flag_back_set")
|
||||
|
||||
res.FlagReset = append(res.FlagReset, flag_back_set)
|
||||
|
||||
sessionId, ok := ctx.Value("SessionId").(string)
|
||||
if !ok {
|
||||
@ -2017,6 +2032,7 @@ func (h *Handlers) insertProfileItems(ctx context.Context, sessionId string, res
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// UpdateAllProfileItems is used to persist all the new profile information and setup the required profile flags
|
||||
func (h *Handlers) UpdateAllProfileItems(ctx context.Context, sym string, input []byte) (resource.Result, error) {
|
||||
var res resource.Result
|
||||
sessionId, ok := ctx.Value("SessionId").(string)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
can we do this right now?
Based on tests i have done so far,it seems the INCMP _ 0 does not make the st.Lateral() evaluate to true,this will need some investigation or clarification if it is the expected behaviour.If this is the case, then we will probably need something similar to this to be able to do away with the input check for back.